Radiosensitivity of a monoclonal human lung adenocarcinoma cell line with MDR phenotype induced by CDDP: an in vitro study
|更新时间:2023-03-30
|
Radiosensitivity of a monoclonal human lung adenocarcinoma cell line with MDR phenotype induced by CDDP: an in vitro study
Journal of Radiation Research and Radiation ProcessingVol. 24, Issue 2, Pages: 107-110(2006)
作者机构:
1.复旦大学放射医学研究所 上海 200032
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
扫 描 看 全 文
ZHANG Junxiang, KONG Zhaolu, SHEN Zhifen, et al. Radiosensitivity of a monoclonal human lung adenocarcinoma cell line with MDR phenotype induced by CDDP: an in vitro study. [J]. Journal of Radiation Research and Radiation Processing 24(2):107-110(2006)
DOI:
ZHANG Junxiang, KONG Zhaolu, SHEN Zhifen, et al. Radiosensitivity of a monoclonal human lung adenocarcinoma cell line with MDR phenotype induced by CDDP: an in vitro study. [J]. Journal of Radiation Research and Radiation Processing 24(2):107-110(2006)DOI:
Radiosensitivity of a monoclonal human lung adenocarcinoma cell line with MDR phenotype induced by CDDP: an in vitro study
The study was to evaluate radiosensitivity of a monoclonal human lung adenocarcinoma cell line SPC−A−1/CDDP−4 with MDR phenotype induced by cisplatin (CDDP) compared with its parental cell SPC−A−1 in vitro. The glutathione (GSH) content and the radiosensitivity of SPC−A−1/CDDP−4 and SPC−A−1 cells were investigated in aerobic and under hypoxia, respectively. The radiosensitization effect of buthionine sulfoximine (BSO), an inhibitor of glutathione (GSH) synthesis, to SPC−A−1/CDDP−4 and SPC−A−1 cells was observed. The results indicated that the monoclonal human lung adenocarcinoma cell line SPC−A−1/CDDP−4 showed, to some extent, a cross−resistance to ,137,Cs γ−ray, in addition to its resistance to anticancer drugs (CDDP, ADM, MTX and VCR). The GSH content of SPC−A−1/CDDP−4 cells was higher than that of SPC−A−1 cells both in aerobic and under hypoxia which might account for it. BSO had radiosensitization effect to SPC−A−1/CDDP−4 and SPC−A−1 cells both in aerobic and under hypoxia, but it was stronger under hypoxia than in aerobic and it was stronger to SPC−A −1/ CDDP−4 cells than to SPC−A−1 cells.